CONTENTS

Front Matter

Title Page, Preface and Acknowledgements
About the Author
Status, History, Issues and Updates
Complementary Textbooks
Teaching Notes and Resources
A Note about Numerical Solutions

Course Units

I. Chemical Reactions
1. Stoichiometry and Reaction Progress
2. Reaction Thermochemistry
3. Reaction Equilibrium
II. Chemical Reaction Kinetics
A. Rate Expressions
4. Reaction Rates and Temperature Effects
5. Empirical and Theoretical Rate Expressions
6. Reaction Mechanisms
7. The Steady State Approximation
8. Rate-Determining Step
9. Homogeneous and Enzymatic Catalysis
10. Heterogeneous Catalysis
B. Kinetics Experiments
11. Laboratory Reactors
12. Performing Kinetics Experiments
C. Analysis of Kinetics Data
13. CSTR Data Analysis
14. Differential Data Analysis
15. Integral Data Analysis
16. Numerical Data Analysis
III. Chemical Reaction Engineering
A. Ideal Reactors
17. Reactor Models and Reaction Types
B. Perfectly Mixed Batch Reactors
18. Reaction Engineering of Batch Reactors
19. Analysis of Batch Reactors
20. Optimization of Batch Reactor Processes
C. Continuous Flow Stirred Tank Reactors
21. Reaction Engineering of CSTRs
22. Analysis of Steady State CSTRs
23. Analysis of Transient CSTRs
24. Multiple Steady States in CSTRs
D. Plug Flow Reactors
25. Reaction Engineering of PFRs
26. Analysis of Steady State PFRs
27. Analysis of Transient PFRs
E. Matching Reactors to Reactions
28. Choosing a Reactor Type
29. Multiple Reactor Networks
30. Thermal Back-Mixing in a PFR
31. Back-Mixing in a PFR via Recycle
32. Ideal Semi-Batch Reactors
IV. Non-Ideal Reactions and Reactors
A. Alternatives to the Ideal Reactor Models
33. Axial Dispersion Model
34. 2-D and 3-D Tubular Reactor Models
35. Zoned Reactor Models
36. Segregated Flow Models
37. Overview of Multi-Phase Reactors
B. Coupled Chemical and Physical Kinetics
38. Heterogeneous Catalytic Reactions
39. Gas-Liquid Reactions
40. Gas-Solid Reactions

Supplemental Units

S1. Identifying Independent Reactions
S2. Solving Non-differential Equations
S3. Fitting Linear Models to Data
S4. Numerically Fitting Models to Data
S5. Solving Initial Value Differential Equations
S6. Solving Boundary Value Differential Equations

Unit 7. The Steady State Approximation

This website provides learning and teaching tools for a first course on kinetics and reaction engineering. The course is divided into four parts (I through IV). Here, in Part II of the course, the focus is on chemical reaction kinetics, and more specifically, on rate expressions, which are mathematical models of reaction rates. As you progress through Part II, you will learn how rate expressions are generated from experimental kinetics data.

This first section of Part II of the course focuses upon the selection of an equation to be tested as a rate expression. The equation to be tested can be chosen simply for its mathematical convenience. Alternatively, theory can be used to select the mathematical form of the equation to be tested. For some reactions, theory can be applied directly. In other cases the reaction must be described in terms of a group of reactions that comprise what is known as a reaction mechanism. In the latter case theory can be applied to the reactions in the mechanism which are then combined to get the mathematical form of the equation to be tested.

An apparent rate expression for a macroscopically observed, non-elementary reaction can be generated if the reaction mechanism is known, as described in Unit 6. The resulting rate expression is of limited utility because it will include concentrations or partial pressures of reactive intermediates, which are very small and challenging to measure. The Bodenstein steady state approximation, presented in this unit, can be used to eliminate the concentration or partial pressure of reactive intermediates from the rate expression. Unit 7 additionally introduces a few other assumptions that can be used to simplify a rate expression derived from a mechanism, provided, of course, that the assumptions are valid.

Learning Resources

Teaching Resources

Practice Problems

1. The formation of phosgene appears macroscopically to take place according to reaction (1a) below. It has been suggested that this reaction does not take place at the molecular level, and that instead the actual events taking place are given by reactions (1b), (1c) and (1d). Supposing that reactions (1b) and (1c) are reversible, but reaction (1d) is effectively irreversible, use the Bodenstein steady state approximation to derive a rate expression for reaction (1a). Your resulting rate expression should not contain concentrations or partial pressures of reactive intermediates.

  CO + Cl2 → COCl2 (1a)  
  Cl2 ↔ 2 Cl (1b)  
  Cl + Cl2 ↔ Cl3 (1c)  
  CO + Cl3 → COCl2 + Cl (1d)  

(Problem Statement as .pdf file)

2*. The solution to Example 6.1 claimed that even though unimolecular reactions cannot be elementary, “[in most cases] a unimolecular reaction will obey the rate expression predicted by transition state theory, except at very low pressures.” Example 7.2 validated this statement for a reaction that was unimolecular in both the forward and reverse directions. This problem considers reaction (2a), which is unimolecular in the forward direction, but bimolecular in the reverse direction. According to transition state theory, the rate expression for the rate of reaction (2a) with respect to B would be given by equation (2b).

  A ↔ B + C (2a)  
  rB,2a = k2a,f⋅[A] - k2a,r⋅[B]⋅[C] (2b)  

Suppose that the mechanism for reaction (2a) is given by reactions (2c) and (2d), where an A* represents a collision-activated molecule and M represents a molecule of any type. Note that reaction (2d) is an elementary reaction because it can occur just as written (the reactant has sufficient energy to react). Treating the collision-activated molecule as a reactive intermediate, use the Bodenstein steady state approximation to derive a rate expression for reaction (2a) and show that at high pressures it is equivalent to the transition state rate expression given in equation (2b).

  A + M ↔ A* + M (2c)  
  A* ↔ B + C (2d)  

(Problem Statement as .pdf file)

3. Reaction (3a) is non-elementary; it has been proposed to occur via the mechanism consisting of reactions (3b) through (3e). Generate a rate expression for the non-elementary reaction (3a) assuming mechanistic steps (3c) and (3d) to be effectively irreversible.

  2 N2O5 ↔ 2 N2O4 + O2 (3a)  
  N2O5 ↔ NO2 + NO3 (3b)  
  NO2 + NO3 → NO2 + O2 + NO (3c)  
  NO + N2O5 → 3 NO2 (3d)  
  2 NO2 ↔ N2O4 (3e)  

(Problem Statement as .pdf file)

* This problem introduces something new that wasn't encountered in the informational or illustrational readings and videos.