![]() |
||
CONTENTSFront MatterCourse UnitsI. Chemical Reactions
II. Chemical Reaction Kinetics
A. Rate Expressions
B. Kinetics Experiments
C. Analysis of Kinetics Data
III. Chemical Reaction Engineering
A. Ideal Reactors
B. Perfectly Mixed Batch Reactors
C. Continuous Flow Stirred Tank Reactors
D. Plug Flow Reactors
E. Matching Reactors to Reactions
IV. Non-Ideal Reactions and Reactors
A. Alternatives to the Ideal Reactor Models
B. Coupled Chemical and Physical Kinetics
Supplemental Units |
Unit 25. Reaction Engineering of PFRsThis website provides learning and teaching tools for a first course on kinetics and reaction engineering. Here, in Part III of the course, the focus is on the modeling of chemical reactors. In particular, it describes reaction engineering using the three ideal reactor types: perfectly mixed batch reactors, continuous flow stirred tank reactors and plug flow reactors. After considering each of the ideal reactor types in isolation, the focus shifts to ideal reactors that are combined with other reactors or equipment to better match the characteristics of the reactor to the reactions running within it. Reaction engineering of the third of the three ideal reactor types, the plug flow reactor (PFR), is the subject of Section D of Part III. The discussion parallels that of the previous two sections: typical reaction engineering tasks are defined, qualitative performance is examined and full mathematical analysis is described and illustrated. Similar to CSTRs, plug flow reactors are typically designed to operate at steady state, but their start-up and shut-down involves transient operation, so both modes of operation are considered in this section. Unit 25 begins the analysis of the third and final ideal reactor type, namely the plug flow reactor. This unit describes the kinds of tasks one may need to accomplish during the reaction engineering of PFRs. The information is very similar to that for CSTRs, since both are flow reactors. It also includes a discussion of the qualitative analysis of PFRs, showing that their performance is often the same as a batch reactor if one substitutes the PFR residence time in place of the duration of a batch reaction process. Learning Resources
Teaching Resources
Practice Problems1. Suppose reaction (1a) occurs adiabatically in a steady state PFR, with the temperature and concentration profiles shown in Figures 1 and 2 in this .pdf file. How would the temperature and concentration profiles change if the reaction was run adiabatically using the same feed temperature and composition in the same steady state reactor, but with the volumetric flow rate doubled?
|