![]() |
||
CONTENTSFront MatterCourse UnitsI. Chemical Reactions
II. Chemical Reaction Kinetics
A. Rate Expressions
B. Kinetics Experiments
C. Analysis of Kinetics Data
III. Chemical Reaction Engineering
A. Ideal Reactors
B. Perfectly Mixed Batch Reactors
C. Continuous Flow Stirred Tank Reactors
D. Plug Flow Reactors
E. Matching Reactors to Reactions
IV. Non-Ideal Reactions and Reactors
A. Alternatives to the Ideal Reactor Models
B. Coupled Chemical and Physical Kinetics
Supplemental Units |
Unit 11. Laboratory ReactorsThis website provides learning and teaching tools for a first course on kinetics and reaction engineering. The course is divided into four parts (I through IV). Here, in Part II of the course, the focus is on chemical reaction kinetics, and more specifically, on rate expressions, which are mathematical models of reaction rates. As you progress through Part II, you will learn how rate expressions are generated from experimental kinetics data. The second section of Part II of the course focuses on gathering experimental data that can be used to test a rate expression. Obtaining those data requires the use of a reactor, and the subsequent analysis of the resulting data will require an accurate mathematical model for the reactor. Consequently Section B examines common types of laboratory reactors and models for them. The commonly used reactor models make assumptions about flow and other aspects of reactor operation, so methods for testing the conformity of experimental reactors to their models are discussed here. Section B also provides some guidelines for the generation of experimental kinetics data. Unit 11 introduces models for three different types of reactors that are commonly used to generate kinetics data in the laboratory, namely batch reactors, continuously stirred tank reactors and plug flow reactors. The critical assumptions in each model are identified, preferred operational methods are discussed and examples are presented. It is critical to test a laboratory reactor to ensure it meets the assumptions being used to model it before using it to generate kinetics data. For a flow reactor, one way of doing this is to measure the age function or residence time distribution and compare it to that predicted by the reactor model. This process is described and illustrated in Unit 11, as well. Learning Resources
Teaching Resources
Practice Problems1. A reactor with a fluid volume of 10 L needs to be tested to determine whether it can be modeled accurately as an ideal CSTR. A steady flow of solvent at 25 L/min is established; there is no tracer in the solvent. Suddenly a valve is opened so that the flow into the reactor contains a tracer at a 3 M concentration. The data below (and in this Excel® workbook) were measured following the opening of the valve. Use these data to calculate the value of the age function for each measurement and plot the age function as a function of the fluid “age.”
(Problem Statement as .pdf file) 2. Derive an expression for the response of a reactor system that consists of two ideal CSTRs connected in series when an impulse stimulus is applied. Then use that expression to generate an expression for the age function for this reactor system. You may assume that the effluent from the first reactor immediately enters the second reactor without any time lag. You may further assume that the fluid volume in the reactors is constant, the volumetric flow rate is constant and the density of the fluid is constant. The reactor operates at steady state with no tracer in the feed prior to the stimulus which is applied to the inlet of the first reactor at time t = 0. (Problem Statement as .pdf file) 3. The data given in problem 11.1 were actually the response of two CSTRs connected in series. The first reactor's fluid volume was 1 L and the second reactor's fluid volume was 9 L. Plot the age function from the experimental reactor and the age function for the two ideal reactors connected in series, and based upon the plot, decide whether the experimental reactors can be modeled as two ideal CSTRs connected in series. (Problem Statement as .pdf file) 4. Suppose you have an 18 gal stirred tank in your lab that you want to use to perform kinetics experiments. You establish a steady flow of water through the reactor at a rate of 5 gal min-1. You then start a timer, at just the same time that you start continuously adding dye to the inlet at a concentration of 2 oz gal-1. You then proceed to measure the concentration of tracer in the outlet as a function of time. The resulting data are given in the table below. On the basis of the age function of the stirred tank, do you believe it can be modeled as an ideal CSTR?
(Problem Statement as .pdf file) 5. In order to test the ideality of a 0.65 gal stirred tank reactor, a steady 1 gal min-1 flow of water was established in it. 25 g of a tracer were then dumped into the tank, and the mass concentration of tracer in the reactor effluent was measured as a function of time. The resulting data are listed in the table below and in the Excel file prob_11_5_data.xlsx. Based on the age function of the stirred tank reactor, can it be modeled as a perfectly mixed CSTR?
|